Defines the computation method, data sources, eligibility criteria, aggregation logic, and publication rules for all CRI reference rates.
View PDF →IOSCO Principles compliance statement, oversight structure, conflict of interest policy, and accountability mechanisms for benchmark administration.
View PDF →Classification tiers (patch, minor, major), notice periods, consultation requirements, and approval procedures for methodology changes.
View PDF →Provisions addressing benchmark unavailability, material change, and cessation for counsel to adapt to the facility’s documentation standard.
View PDF →Documents the design choices behind CRI — why flat median, why 7-day window, why seller-ask noninterruptible, why open methodology.
View PDF →Process for submitting and resolving complaints regarding CRI benchmark rates, methodology application, or administrator conduct.
View PDF →Source selection, monitoring, and removal criteria. Functional replacement for IOSCO Principle 14 (Submitter Code of Conduct), which is Not Applicable to algorithmic collection.
View PDF →Voluntary alignment with all 19 IOSCO Principles for Financial Benchmarks. No other GPU compute benchmark has published an IOSCO compliance statement. Targeted: P5 Oversight Board (due March 2027) and P17 Annual Independent Audit (first full calendar year). Not Applicable: P11, P12, P14 — submitter-related principles; CRI uses automated data collection with no human submitters. Full principle-by-principle assessment in the Governance Framework.